Data from FICTION The collocates of 'CHAIN_n' in fiction, such as 'door', 'neck', 'leather', and 'padlock', evoke a sense of physicality and tangible objects. They suggest themes of confinement, security, and human relationships, often in a narrative context. The use of items like 'gold' and 'silver' indicates a connection to wealth or value, while terms like 'fingers' and 'man' hint at personal interaction or character involvement. Overall, these collocates reflect a focus on the material and experiential aspects of chains, emphasizing their symbolic meanings in storytelling.

Data from ACADEMIC In the academic context, the collocates of 'CHAIN_n' point to more abstract and systematic uses of the term. Words like 'commodity', 'management', and 'supply' suggest discussions of economic and organizational frameworks. The presence of terms like 'analysis' and 'method' indicates a focus on research and theoretical exploration, while 'migration' and 'production' reflect broader systemic relationships. This suggests that 'CHAIN_n' is often used to discuss interconnected processes and structures, particularly in fields like economics, sociology, and biology.

Comparison of phrases in [FICTION] and [ACADEMIC] The primary difference in the collocates of 'CHAIN_n' between fiction and academic contexts lies in their focus. Fiction emphasizes tangible, personal experiences, often highlighting physical chains and their emotional or narrative significance, such as 'neck', 'padlock', and 'man'. In contrast, the academic usage prioritizes abstract concepts related to systems and processes, using terms like 'commodity', 'management', and 'analysis'. This indicates that while fiction explores individual and relatable aspects of chains, academic discourse tends to analyze their structural and functional roles within larger frameworks.